|
« back
futurist manifesto of lust
A reply to those dishonest journalists
who twist phrases to make the Idea seem ridiculous;
Lust, when viewed without moral preconceptions and as an essential part of lifes dynamism, is a force. Lust is not, any more than pride, a mortal sin for the race that is strong. Lust, like pride, is a virtue that urges one on, a powerful source of energy. Lust is the expression of a being projected beyond itself. It is the painful joy of wounded flesh, the joyous pain of a flowering. And whatever secrets unite these beings, it is a union of flesh. It is the sensory and sensual synthesis that leads to the greatest liberation of spirit. It is the communion of a particle of humanity with all the sensuality of the earth. Lust is the quest of the flesh for the unknown, just as Celebration is the spirits quest for the unknown. Lust is the act of creating, it is Creation. Flesh creates in the way that the spirit creates. In the eyes of the Universe their creation is equal. One is not superior to the other and creation of the spirit depends on that of the flesh. We possess body and spirit. To curb one and develop the other shows weakness and is wrong. A strong man must realize his full carnal and spiritual potentiality. The satisfaction of their lust is the conquerors due. After a battle in which men have died, it is normal for the victors, proven in war, to turn to rape in the conquered land, so that life may be re-created. When they have fought their battles, soldiers seek sensual pleasures, in which their constantly battling energies can be unwound and renewed. The modern hero, the hero in any field, experiences the same desire and the same pleasure. The artist, that great universal medium, has the same need. And the exaltation of the initiates of those religions still sufficiently new to contain a tempting element of the unknown, is no more than sensuality diverted spiritually towards a sacred female image. Art and war are the great manifestations of sensuality; lust is their
flower. A people exclusively spiritual or a people exclusively carnal
would be condemned to the same decadence Lust excites energy and releases strength. Pitilessly it drove
primitive man to victory, for the pride of bearing back a woman the spoils of
the defeated. Today it drives the great men of business who run the banks, the
press and international trade to increase their wealth by creating centers,
harnessing energies and exalting the crowds, to worship and glorify with it
the object of their lust. These men, tired but strong, find time for lust, the
principal motive force of their action and of the reactions caused by their
actions affecting multitudes and worlds.
Even among the new peoples where sensuality has not yet been released or
acknowledged, and who are neither primitive brutes nor the sophisticated
representatives of the old civilizations, woman is equally the great
galvanizing principle to which all is offered. The secret cult that man has
for her is only the unconscious drive of a lust as yet barely woken. Amongst
these peoples as amongst the peoples of the north, but for different reasons,
lust is almost exclusively concerned with procreation. But lust, under
whatever aspects it shows itself, whether they are considered normal or
abnormal, is always the supreme spur.
The animal life, the life of energy, the life of the spirit, sometimes
demand a respite. And effort for efforts sake calls inevitably for effort for
pleasures sake. These efforts are not mutually harmful but complementary, and
realize fully the total being.
For heroes, for those who create with the spirit, for dominators of all
fields, lust is the magnificent exaltation of their strength. For every being
it is a motive to surpass oneself with the simple aim of self-selection, of
being noticed, chosen, picked out.
Christian morality alone, following on from pagan morality, was fatally
drawn to consider lust as a weakness. Out of the healthy joy which is the
flowering of the flesh in all its power it has made something shameful and
to be hidden, a vice to be denied. It has covered it with hypocrisy, and this
has made a sin of it.
We must stop despising Desire, this attraction at once delicate and
brutal between two bodies, of whatever sex, two bodies that want each other,
striving for unity. We must stop despising Desire, disguising it in the pitiful
clothes of old and sterile sentimentality.
It is not lust that disunites, dissolves and annihilates. It is rather the
mesmerizing complications of sentimentality, artificial jealousies, words that
inebriate and deceive, the rhetoric of parting and eternal fidelities,
literary nostalgia We must get rid of all the ill-omened debris of romanticism,
counting daisy petals, moonlight duets, heavy endearments, false hypocritical
modesty. When beings are drawn together by a physical attraction, let
them Physical modesty, which varies according to time and place, has only the
ephemeral value of a social virtue.
We must face up to lust in full conciousness. We must make of it
what a sophisticated and intelligent being makes of himself and of his life;
we must make lust into a work of art. To allege unwariness or
bewilderment in order to explain an act of love is hypocrisy, weakness and
stupidity.
We should desire a body consciously, like any other thing.
Love at first sight, passion or failure to think, must not prompt us to be
constantly giving ourselves, nor to take beings, as we are usually inclined to
do so due to our inability to see into the future. We must choose
intelligently. Directed by our intuition and will, we should compare the
feelings and desires of the two partners and avoid uniting and satisfying any
that are unable to complement and exalt each other.
Equally conciously and with the same guiding will, the joys of this
coupling should lead to the climax, should develop its full potential, and
should permit to flower all the seeds sown by the merging of two bodies. Lust
should be made into a work of art, formed like every work of art, both
instinctively and consciously.
We must strip lust of all the sentimental veils that disfigure it.
These veils were thrown over it out of mere cowardice, because smug
sentimentality is so satisfying. Sentimentality is comfortable and therefore
demeaning.
In one who is young and healthy, when lust clashes with sentimentality,
lust is victorious. Sentiment is a creature of fashion, lust is eternal. Lust
triumphs, because it is the joyous exaltation that drives one beyond oneself,
the delight in posession and domination, the perpetual victory from which the
perpetual battle is born anew, the headiest and surest intoxication of
conquest. And as this certain conquest is temporary, it must be constantly won
anew.
Lust is a force, in that it refines the spirit by bringing to white heat
the excitement of the flesh. The spirit burns bright and clear from a
healthy, strong flesh, purified in the embrace. Only the weak and sick sink
into the mire and are diminished. And lust is a force in that it kills the
weak and exalts the strong, aiding natural selection.
Lust is a force, finally, in that it never leads to the insipidity of the
definite and the secure, doled out by soothing sentimentality. Lust is the
eternal battle, never finally won. After the fleeting triumph, even during
the ephemeral triumph itself, reawakening dissatisfaction spurs a human being,
driven by an orgiastic will, to expand and surpass himself.
Lust is for the body what an ideal is for the spirit Lust is a force.
|